All templates

Agile Requirements Breakdown

Deanne Watt

0 Views
0 uses
0 likes

Report

Building a Work Breakdown Structure for Agile Requirements helps teams turn a feature into sprint-ready work by mapping scope, functional areas, subcomponents, stories, acceptance criteria, ownership, and dependencies in one visual WBS.

What is it?

  • A 75–90 minute workshop to translate an epic into buildable, testable backlog work

  • A shared map of UX, logic, states, integrations, analytics, and edge cases

  • A handoff-ready structure that reduces ambiguity before refinement

What problem does it solve?

  • Vague requirements that become risky tickets

  • Hidden complexity that surfaces late (states, dependencies, compliance, tracking)

  • Misalignment between product intent, design details, and engineering expectations

How to use

  1. Define goal, success criteria, and scope boundaries

  2. Break work into functional areas (flows, logic, states, integrations, analytics)

  3. Decompose each area into subcomponents and work items

  4. Convert key items into stories with acceptance criteria and test cases

  5. Visualize WBS levels and tag ownership, dependencies, and blockers

Common pitfalls

  • Jumping to tickets before agreeing on scope and success

  • Forgetting non-happy paths (errors, empty states, permissions, loading)

  • No ownership labels, so items stall after the workshop

Ways to avoid mistakes

  • Lock “in/out of scope” in writing before decomposition

  • Use a required checklist per area: states, validation, copy, analytics, accessibility

  • Assign a single DRI per work item; tag blockers and next steps immediately

FAQ

Q: Who can benefit from this template? A: Product managers, designers, engineers, QA, and cross-functional teams prepping epics for refinement and sprint planning. Q: What’s the right level of detail? A: Enough that an engineer can estimate and QA can test without guessing key behaviors. Q: When should we run this workshop? A: Before refinement for a new epic, after discovery, or when a feature is blocked by unclear scope.

Miro Features Used Frames for each workshop step, Sticky notes for functional areas and subcomponents, Sections for WBS levels (deliverable → area → component → work item), Voting to prioritize, and Tags or color labels for owner, dependency, and blocker status.

Deanne Watt

Product Strategy @ MiNDPOPToolkit.com

My approach to product is to get to the heart of what drives a company. I am passionate about the entire end-to-end process and making it more efficient, collaborative as well as aligning teams and improving communication. We have built about 200 Miro boards so far that cover ideation, strategy, design, engineering, and even marketing promotion.


Categories

Similar templates