Create where everyone can create

“Miro is more broad, and well suited for other professionals, not only designers, like FigJam. The learning curve is shorter, and the interface displays the most common tools for whiteboard and editing types of dynamics, in addition to other specific features.”

“Figjam is comparable, but ironically not as user friendly/intuitive. The templates aren't as good; they are very finicky if they are submitted by users. There are also a lot of different behaviors that just don't work as smoothly as miro. I've never felt frustrated with what I can't do with Miro, but I have with FigJam.”

“FigJam is great for design collaboration due to its tight integration and unfication of resources under one product. The FigJam featureset is not mature enough to run workshops or do deeply complex diagramming which is where Miro shines.”